UncomMarket logoUncomMarket
zz_ill6
zz_ill6
27d agoGovernment

We can save Social Security if the wealthy fork over their share.

9
48

Upvoters11

1NiftyLynx258NiftyLynx258Early29d ago
2sikLychilllysikLychilllyEarly28d ago
3KeenFalcon3440KeenFalcon3440Early28d ago
4Dark-Bear326Dark-Bear326Early28d ago
5zzil_l7zzil_l7Early28d ago

48 Comments

Jolly-Whale639
Jolly-Whale639· 28d ago

Just remove the cap. A cap on taxes makes no sense for a program that’s underfunded.

50
Free-Wolf494
Free-Wolf494· 28d ago

i mean, it makes total sense if the government is bought and paid for by said millionaires and billionaires...

1
AdSpecialisT6598
AdSpecialisT6598· 28d ago

Or allow opt out. I wish I could opt out or at least control where the funds are invested I could get likely 5x the results if I just invested into market instead.

0
Emerhency_Pepper3537
Emerhency_Pepper3537· 27d ago

It's not underfunded. In 2025 it was the third largest congressional budget category and recieved something like 1.3 trillion dollars of funding. This is an 8% increase from 2024. Heres the only other two "more important" things (by total funding) in the federal budget. 1. Th...

0
UsefulTangerinE4340
UsefulTangerinE4340· 27d ago

A lot of the world's problems could be solved by the wealthy not being allowed to hoard their wealth.

50
jobsForthe_doGs48
jobsForthe_doGs48· 28d ago

I'm going to pose a speculation. Sometimes I'd like to put myself in the shoes of a billionaire. I don't think people go out into the world thinking "I'm going to be EVIL". Humans justify their evil behavior as good, by twisting reality to match their world view. Here's my ar...

0
rolandc7_10
rolandc7_10· 28d ago

Dividends, interest, and capital gains aren't subject to FICA anyway, are they? Isn't that where most of the wealth is coming from? Not labor income.

50
PhoenixBrave60
PhoenixBrave60· 27d ago

You are correct. People arguing "scrap the cap" think they are sticking it to billionaires. The reality is they are sticking out to doctors, engineers, lawyers, scientists, software developers, etc. In a VHCOL area, you begin including laborers, such as longshoremen. 20% of p...

50
Justin_Godfrey72
Justin_Godfrey72· 27d ago

Not only should they have to pay into it, but they should also forfeit all payments and benefits from it. They got more than enough money to retire on.

42
PhoenixClever18
PhoenixClever18· 27d ago

Delusionally, that’s the reason some of them say they shouldn’t have to pay into it at all

1
lUmpycurvevalls
lUmpycurvevalls· 27d ago

We already have welfare program to facilitate transfer payments.

6
ANEB0ME
ANEB0ME· 27d ago

The cap is part of the idea that Social Security is "getting your own money back." If you remove that fig leaf, SociSec becomes "welfare for old people" and will absolutely be attacked on that basis. It doesnt prevent attacks on Social Security, but dont make it rhetorically...

29
vashchulau
vashchulau· 28d ago

Would it work out to add another bend point. Or more than one more. So people continue to get something added to their monthly payments, but even less than they get now on the highest earnings.

5
therea_lAjani
therea_lAjani· 28d ago

No, remove the fig leaf. This whole like "If we do x they'll attack it as y." despite knowing full and well that people are going to attack it anyway is part of why the Republicans are so fucking effective at neutering so many democratic/progressive proposals. And it's not e...

13
Bear_8566
Bear_8566· 27d ago

They want to rip it apart so finance bros have even more of your retirement money to use on gambling with extra steps.

18
CalmMoose540
CalmMoose540· 27d ago

If the money paid into SS for a 5% return, the benefits everyone would get would be double what they are now. 5% return assets are like low risk corporate loans. Hardly gambling and I’m sure most people would prefer to have double their payment at retirement.

0
Happy-Mountain442
Happy-Mountain442· 27d ago

We can and should tax rich folk more. And we can fund social security the dame way we fund wars: by spending the money into existence.

5
BatSleepy38
BatSleepy38· 27d ago

Not really, a billionaire is wealth, not income. Even if they make a billion dollar salary it's usually not taxed as income, it's stock options etc. The main point still stands for sure, but it'd take more to have them pay a fair share than removing the cap.

3
Ad
Justin_Godfrey42
Justin_Godfrey42· 27d ago

Just want to clarify one thing here. Being a millionaire or a billionaire is irrelevant. It's an income issue - i.e. people who make 1 MM or 1 billion a year make enough in the first x number of days to be capped out. This is an even smaller issue in terms of the number of peo...

2
SloaNe_3415
SloaNe_3415· 27d ago

Keep in mind, the income returned is also capped which is why there’s a cap on the tax you have to pay into SS. Not arguing for or against, just stating a fact of the program.

2
DeliCious-Ad4799
DeliCious-Ad4799· 27d ago

Scrap the cap! Billionaires are the problem, not brown people!

2
DatBoI_86
DatBoI_86· 27d ago

or, how about we do a wealth tax, every dollar over a billion, 100% tax. Every dollar over 500 million, 50% tax.... so on and so forth...

2
LuverOfAllThimgs14
LuverOfAllThimgs14· 27d ago

Have seen a lot of wealthy groups lobbying for reductions in property taxes under the guise that they're too high for retirees. Seems like there's a partial solution to be had here by tying the two ideas together: Give a federal tax credit for any taxes paid on property belo...

2
WellSocialized37
WellSocialized37· 27d ago

Removing the cap (without raising benefits for the top payers) would only endanger social security the next time a Republican wants something to target by making it a welfare program (instead of an insurance program). And make it yet another wealth transfer to the older gener...

1
coa_chkler63
coa_chkler63· 27d ago

This can take off with Gen Z— keep saying NO CAP

1
NiftyLynx258
NiftyLynx258· 28d ago

America isn't a real country

1
Ad
L_KKRGrandCRoss
L_KKRGrandCRoss· 28d ago

Or do it like everyone else, pay % of income tax, every month, get benefits from the government like healthcare, food for every kid in school, roads, trains, gun laws \^-\^

1
BraveTiger592
BraveTiger592· 27d ago

Fuck social security, it's a literal scam for the majority of people.

1
Bear_7588
Bear_7588· 28d ago

Putting more money into a broken and corrupt system will not fix the system.

1
BadgerBright29
BadgerBright29· 27d ago

The return on investment of Social Security is a government scam.

1
AdvancedMarsuPial705
AdvancedMarsuPial705· 27d ago

we need more laws to give billionaires more tax breaks

1
RatSpicy53
RatSpicy53· 27d ago

The social security tax you pay does not fund the program. Here is a short excerpt from FDR talking about it. MEMORANDUM ON CONFERENCE WITH FDR CONCERNING SOCIAL SECURITY TAXATION, SUMMER, 1941 FDR said, “I guess you’re right on the economics. They are politics all the way t...

1
BadgerNeat96
BadgerNeat96· 27d ago

We can save millions of women by prosecuting billionaires for the contents of the epstein files.

1
BearSleepy41
BearSleepy41· 27d ago

You won't. There's too many politicians that will waste the money.

1
Ad
BrightDog88
BrightDog88· 27d ago

Billionaires should pay the lion share

1
BearBright30
BearBright30· 27d ago

And some saying it’s underfunded, we buy our own treasury bonds with the surplus we do have, so government can write themselves a check. It’s fucking wack. Surprised they cap it honestly.

1
Sttange_chip_3434
Sttange_chip_3434· 27d ago

Can we go back to shiny rock currency yet?

0
PhoenixCrispy92
PhoenixCrispy92· 27d ago

I just had a thought: what if the Billionaires are only so on paper, and their actual wealth is all based on their privileged abilities to function in an endless loop of taking out loans on loans, and none of their actual net worth is real? Then of course they couldn't contr...

0
HappySeAweed5213
HappySeAweed5213· 28d ago

Agreed! Emperor for Life Trump needs more of your money! Stop being an evil capitalist and give it all to him!

0
Otter_3025
Otter_3025· 27d ago

Removing the cap would hurt people who are high w-2 earners. I know you’re probably OK with that but keep in mind these people already have to pay full tuition for their kids to go to college, pay higher health insurance premiums for company sponsored benefits, and save for re...

0
31yh8rtffp
31yh8rtffp· 28d ago

Ok. We change it to tax capital gains and possessions worth more than one million with an exception for one permanent residence per family. So if they want a 10 million dollar yacht they pay a 10 million dollar fee for it. So a 100 percent tax on purchase and 10 percent per...

2
Fair-Owl330
Fair-Owl330· 27d ago

They will down vote you even though you are right. This post is purposely misleading because social security is funded by payroll taxes. So high income earners would foot the bill more so than billionaires if the cap was removed.

6
g35menaxe
g35menaxe· 27d ago

Abandon social security embrace social safety net

0
EagerOwl994
EagerOwl994· 27d ago

Or keep both? Maybe phase in something similar to Australia's Super instead of social security. On the social safety net side- Housing first and universal single payor healthcare would be great starts. Give private healthcare something viable to compete against (I think too ma...

11
FedUpHRog
FedUpHRog· 27d ago

As an American, we aren’t being picky, we just want something, anything to help us retire and age in a dignified sort of way. Instead of dying as a Walmart greeter, greeting strangers as I pass away into the great unknown and possibly haunting that Walmart for eternity.

35